Friday, July 20, 2012
One of the biggest hurdle for Hikikomori people to work is explaining Hikikomori period to recruiters.
In most cases job applicants are required to submit their resumes. They need to write their educational and career history. And If they receive an opportunity to attend a job interview, they need to explain their background.
But needless to say, most recruiters are unwilling to hire applicants who have the history of Hikikomori. That hinders Hikikomori people from getting a job. This may be a factor why Hikikomori population has been aging.
Some people, including specialists in helping Hikikomori people, give some advice on how to approach the problem.
As far as I know, many of them suggest Hikikomori people should explain they have blank period honestly but not explain they suffered from Hikikomori. Instead, it is better to explain, for example, they studied for some sort of qualification test, they helped their family business, etc.
Some suggest they change their background information slightly. For example, if a Hikikomori man has the experience of part time jobs, they suggest he explain his working period longer than in reality to fill his blank period. It may be unethical, but Hikikomori people may have few other choices to get a job.
In any case, Hikikomori people need to prepare to explain how they did in their Hikikomori period. From recruiters' point of view, it is natural to ask applicants about their blank period.
In most cases job applicants are required to submit their resumes. They need to write their educational and career history. And If they receive an opportunity to attend a job interview, they need to explain their background.
But needless to say, most recruiters are unwilling to hire applicants who have the history of Hikikomori. That hinders Hikikomori people from getting a job. This may be a factor why Hikikomori population has been aging.
Some people, including specialists in helping Hikikomori people, give some advice on how to approach the problem.
As far as I know, many of them suggest Hikikomori people should explain they have blank period honestly but not explain they suffered from Hikikomori. Instead, it is better to explain, for example, they studied for some sort of qualification test, they helped their family business, etc.
Some suggest they change their background information slightly. For example, if a Hikikomori man has the experience of part time jobs, they suggest he explain his working period longer than in reality to fill his blank period. It may be unethical, but Hikikomori people may have few other choices to get a job.
In any case, Hikikomori people need to prepare to explain how they did in their Hikikomori period. From recruiters' point of view, it is natural to ask applicants about their blank period.
Monday, January 2, 2012
One Hikikomori man (then thirty-years-old) killed and wounded his family members and set fire to his house on April 17, 2010.
Takayuki Iwase lived in Toyokawa, Aichi Prefecture, central Japan. He had withdrawn from society for 14 years.
His parents entrusted management of family finances to him. But he was gradually absorbed in Internet shopping and auctions. That led him to have about 3 million yen of debt. So, his father canceled a contract with internet service provider. He got angry and committed crimes. His father and a girl (then 1-years-old) were killed and other families who lived together with him, including his mother, were wounded.
He was arrested, and the case was taken to court. The disputed point was whether he was responsible for his actions, because he had mental health issues. Before the ruling, his lawyers requested experts to examine whether he had any mental health problems. The experts' view was that he had (1) autistic spectrum disorder (2) intellectual disability (3) shopaholic, and his lawyers asserted that the defendant had limited responsibility. On the other hand, prosecutors also requested another experts to examine his mental health problems, and experts concluded he was responsible. Based on the research result, prosecutors demanded life imprisonment.
In the end, he was sentenced to thirty years in prison at the first trial on December 7, 2011.The court ruled that the defendant had responsibility, because he had ability to behave in response to how his family members in front of him behaved, for example, he chased them who attempted to escape from him.
He filed an appeal against the decision on December 12, 2011.
Takayuki Iwase lived in Toyokawa, Aichi Prefecture, central Japan. He had withdrawn from society for 14 years.
His parents entrusted management of family finances to him. But he was gradually absorbed in Internet shopping and auctions. That led him to have about 3 million yen of debt. So, his father canceled a contract with internet service provider. He got angry and committed crimes. His father and a girl (then 1-years-old) were killed and other families who lived together with him, including his mother, were wounded.
He was arrested, and the case was taken to court. The disputed point was whether he was responsible for his actions, because he had mental health issues. Before the ruling, his lawyers requested experts to examine whether he had any mental health problems. The experts' view was that he had (1) autistic spectrum disorder (2) intellectual disability (3) shopaholic, and his lawyers asserted that the defendant had limited responsibility. On the other hand, prosecutors also requested another experts to examine his mental health problems, and experts concluded he was responsible. Based on the research result, prosecutors demanded life imprisonment.
In the end, he was sentenced to thirty years in prison at the first trial on December 7, 2011.The court ruled that the defendant had responsibility, because he had ability to behave in response to how his family members in front of him behaved, for example, he chased them who attempted to escape from him.
He filed an appeal against the decision on December 12, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)